60-MPG Fuel Standard Is Economically Viable – Report

A fleet-wide car and light truck fuel economy standard of 60 miles per gallon
(mpg) by 2025 is critical and necessary for consumer pocketbook protection, according to a new economic analysis from the Consumer Federation of America
(CFA) identifies.

The Obama
Administration will release a Notice of Intent for 2017-2025 light duty fuel economy standards
on September 30th.

“Previous fuel economy standards have left huge consumer savings on the table. A 60
mile per gallon standard in 2025 will capture those enormous benefits and provide important
protections for American consumers,” commented report author Mark Cooper, CFA Director of
Research.

The report includes a consumer pocketbook analysis, which finds that for consumers
purchasing 60 mpg cars and trucks the value of the gas savings will be greater than the increased
cost of the loan.
Consumers will save money in the first year of ownership, and their purchase, when financed
by a five year auto loan, will be cash neutral in the first month.

A 60 mpg vehicle will save the typical car buyer over $1,000 in gas costs over and above the
increased car cost by the time the auto loan is paid off (typically 5 years) and $3,000 over the
life of the vehicle (roughly ten years), which the consumer could capture in the sale price of
the vehicle or by holding on to it.

The report combines estimates of technology cost from the National Academy of Sciences
and MIT with the costs benefit analysis previously prepared by the Environmental Protection
Agency and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to derive its
estimates of what is technologically feasible and economically justified.

The Energy
Information Administration’s projected price of gasoline for 2025 of $3.50 (in 2010 dollars) is
used. For the consumer pocketbook analysis, a five-year auto loan at 7% interest is
assumed (which is the average auto loan rate for the past 20 years).
According to the report, the 2016 standard of 34 mpg falls far short of what would be in
the best interest of consumers and society.

The economic analysis shows that going to 38 mpg
would have delivered additional benefits of $140 billion over the life of the vehicles covered.
Moving the standard to 60 mpg will add hundreds of billions of consumer savings and reduced
greenhouse gas emissions by hundreds of millions of tons.

The report identifies a reluctant automobile industry as the biggest obstacle to achieving the
greatest consumer benefits through higher fuel economy. “One of the reasons that the administration must set targets so far in advance is that the
industry has been slow to adjust to the clear consumer demand for greater fuel economy,”
Cooper said. “We must set our sights on a higher mid-term goal like 60 mpg by 2025 to get
the industry moving in the right direction."

“The decision to coordinate standard setting between California, the Environmental
Protection Agency and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration was an important
step forward that required a compromise on the initial levels at which the standards were set,”
Cooper added. “The procedural progress must now be followed up with substantive progress
that moves the standards to much higher levels. A real victory can only be claimed when the
standards are set at a level that captures the immense benefits that had been left on the table.”

The report is available at the link below.

Website: [sorry this link is no longer available]     
(Visited 6,430 times, 2 visits today)

Post Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *